Instructional Design Activity: Course Design
Your IDA was evaluated by: Greg Clinton Overall Instructor Rating: Satisfactory Ratings explanation:
Instructor's Overall Feedback: Thanks for providing the ICM -- I focused exclusively on this in giving you feedback (it's always easier to react to a visual). Great work! Just a few comments: First, I note that you combined your course and unit ICMs together. I really have no complaint about this per se, because you used the space well. But I note that you didn't denote any supporting objectives or prerequisite skills for the unit you chose (Unit 2), and I wonder if creating a separate map for the unit might help to make these items more clear. I put it that way partly because you do have a supporting verbal information item - a list of appropriate keywords for searching - but you haven't presented it as a verbal information item in your diagram. Thus for this item, the verb "generate" is too lofty - one wouldn't normally "generate" a "list," since generate is used for problem-solving. I would re-word this one to say "SWBAT list appropriate keywords for searching." And, of course, it needs to be labeled with a V with a triangle around it like the other verbal information examples you've seen. One pretty serious problem is the phrasing in each of your unit objectives - "demonstrate knowledge of." By now you probably remember me highlighting this kind of thing in class - in any case, this is just as much of a no-no in an objective as saying "students will know" or "students will understand." Objectives really must present measurable behaviors. So, for unit 1, for example, consider changing it to "SWBAT demonstrate, by selecting the appropriate categories and procedures (or something like that), visual searching using the visual search categories." You will need to revise all of your unit objectives along these lines. Your terminal objective for the course, likewise, needs a standard learned capability verb. It looks to me like "Given an assortment of search need scenarios, SWBAT generate all categories of searches using the Destiny Catalog (OPAC)" might be a step in the right direction. In any case, you want to stick with "generate" at this level, and make sure that there really is some problem-solving involved in the ultimate outcome you are trying to teach for the course. Your attitudinal objective is presented appropriately, including the customary circled A. Also, I see that you have placed all of the unit objectives on the same level. This looks ok to me, but I wonder if unit 2 could possibly be placed below the others in the sequence since it presents "basic" search categories. Would that logically come before the others? I leave that up to you. Finally, the three lesson-level objectives need learned capability verbs. Most commonly at this level these would be "classify" or "identify." And be sure to remove the "generate a list" language in the third lesson objective. I see also that these lessons don't appear to be dependent on each other, so placing them side-by-side in the diagram looks right. Ok, that's it for this IDA. Once again, great job! Just be sure you understand my feedback, and as always let me know what questions you have for me. Greg
This activity builds on the needs assessment IDA. This IDA is divided into two parts. First, you will design a rough outline of a course. In this context, "course" is defined as an instructional entity, which has both a recognizable start and finish point, and has an organized set of content. It is the most general instructional solution to a problem identified in needs assessment. Second, you will choose one of the units from your course design and design a rough outline of that unit (of course, in the 'real world', you would do this for all of your units). The activity is designed to give you hands-on practice with course- and unit-level task analysis. |