Instructional Design Activity: Course Design
Your IDA was evaluated by: Greg Clinton Overall Instructor Rating: Satisfactory Ratings explanation:
Instructor's Overall Feedback: Thanks for providing the ICMs -- I focused mainly on those in giving you feedback (it's always easier to react to a visual). Great work! I'm glad to see that you used the learned capability verbs for each objective (not everyone did this). Just a few comments about these and other things: -- Course Design -- Looking pretty good here. Your units seem to be lined up in a logical sequence. Your attitudinal objective is presented appropriately with the circled A (although the arrowheads are not really required here). One pretty serious problem is the phrasing your unit 2 & 3 objectives - "demonstrate knowledge of." By now you probably remember me highlighting this kind of thing in class - in any case, this is just as much of a no-no in an objective as saying "students will know" or "students will understand." Objectives really must present measurable behaviors. Thus for unit 2 I would probably use "identify the components of an outline" (although ideally as a unit objective it should have a higher level) and for unit 3 I would use "demonstrate creating a diagram and outline using Inspiration" - something like that. -- Unit Design -- It's interesting that in this unit you have in mind the components of an outline as the content for the unit objective, but each of the lesson objectives you identified to lead to that is to *generate* an outline. This turns out to be one of those classic learning hierarchy violations (don't worry - I'm not going to give you a ticket). I have already suggested above that one would want to teach higher level of learning in units, and you seem to have sensed that here. But your unit objective uses "demonstrate," which is a lower level than "generate"; and meanwhile it should probably have been "identify" the components, which is even lower. I do get it here that you want learners to practice creating outlines so as to become familiar with the components. But what is the purpose of being familiar with the components? It is (unless I'm really missing something) to be able to generate outlines. So the real outcome for this unit, it seems, is to be able to generate some kind of outline correctly, with correct use of the components. And one or more of the subskills would involve identifying the components. Thus you will want to revisit this unit objective as well as its relation to the other units in the course. Meantime, your verbal information item looks good, and I note that the outcome of your previous unity is the prerequisite here (though you rephrased it a bit). Between you and your teammates, you'll want to make sure someone knows how to add a horizontal line to separate the prerequisite skills in whatever unit design you are working with. It is a bit tricky to make a line without shapes attached at either end, but here's the gist: my trick is to create two text boxes filled only with the space bar, so that they become invisible when deselected; and then I link them together and edit the link to remove the arrowhead and make the line dotted & thicker. I keep telling myself there's got to be a better way - especially since the rest of the program is so intuitive. Oh well ... Ok, that's it for this IDA. Again, great job! Do make sure you understand my feedback, and as always let me know if you have questions for me. Greg
This activity builds on the needs assessment IDA. This IDA is divided into two parts. First, you will design a rough outline of a course. In this context, "course" is defined as an instructional entity, which has both a recognizable start and finish point, and has an organized set of content. It is the most general instructional solution to a problem identified in needs assessment. Second, you will choose one of the units from your course design and design a rough outline of that unit (of course, in the 'real world', you would do this for all of your units). The activity is designed to give you hands-on practice with course- and unit-level task analysis. |