Instructional Design Activity: Course Design
Your IDA was evaluated by: Rui HU Overall Instructor Rating: Satisfactory Ratings explanation:
Instructor's Overall Feedback: Your Course & Unit Design IDA is actually the best that I have seen among all the Course & Unit Designs I have reviewed for this IDA! So, great job! As your buddy said, you have been able to narrow your focus to simple tasks and you have a very good understanding about the top-down structure of course->units->lessons and subordinate skills. You just have a few typical problems that people new to course and unit design usually experience. Fixing these problems will not be difficult, so please read my feedback carefully and let me know if you have any questions. Your ICMs Thanks for providing the ICMs -- it's always easier to react to course and unit design when shown visually. And, the act of creating flow charts helps the design process -- a visual shows the course structure in a way that a list cannot, such as by showing which units build on each other (which they all seem to do in your case). I noticed that the terminal course objective in your course level ICM was different from that you stated in part 1. You did very well by stating the terminal course objective as “Classroom teachers will be able to generate a document using a free collaborative planning tool called GoogleDocs by entering, editing, storing, and sharing a document.”, but when you draw the course ICM, you just changed the terminal course objective to another one, which is similar but still different from your written terminal course objective in your IDA. And the level of intellectual domain therefore decreased to “rule-using”. You may want to change this in your final project. In addition, the objective of “SWBAT demonstrate an increase in their job performance” looks too broad and it was not much instructional related. You did not provide a Unit ICM at the end. Although it is not required, but it is always good to have a visual representation for your instructional design. Unit level needs to address concepts It is typical for a Unit ICM to address concept learning, whereas you stayed at the level of rule-using ("demonstrate") for your lesson 1, 2 and3 objectives. It's important in a Unit-level ICM to get more specific, so I recommend that you add the concept learning to this ICM (just keep this in mind when you do your final project). Note from Lloyd: As Maggie points out, you did an excellent job with this IDA. We almost gave you a rating of "exemplary," however, you should have focused attention on identifying conceptual learning outcomes in your lesson objectives so as to narrow your design to the necessary concepts. Again, nice work!
This activity builds on the needs assessment IDA. This IDA is divided into two parts. First, you will design a rough outline of a course. In this context, "course" is defined as an instructional entity, which has both a recognizable start and finish point, and has an organized set of content. It is the most general instructional solution to a problem identified in needs assessment. Second, you will choose one of the units from your course design and design a rough outline of that unit (of course, in the 'real world', you would do this for all of your units). The activity is designed to give you hands-on practice with course- and unit-level task analysis. |