Instructional Design Activity: Course Design
Your IDA was evaluated by: Rui Hu Overall Instructor Rating: Satisfactory Ratings explanation:
Instructor's Overall Feedback: You did a very good job on this IDA. You just have a few typical problems that people new to course and unit design usually experience. Fixing these problems will not be difficult, so please read my feedback carefully and let me know if you have any questions. Your ICMs The assignment asks for ICMs at two places. One is on part 1: step 4, which asks for a course level ICM, and the other one is at the end of part 2, which asks for a Unit ICM. There is only one ICM at the end of your IDA, and I just used it as a course level ICM. This ICM, however, seems to not clearly address the flow or the sequence of learning. There are two parallel branches under your terminal course objectives. One is the unit 1, which is “learners will demonstrate the steps they need to take to search literature on their topic”. This one, nonetheless, seems to be a replication of your terminal course objective, with slight rewording. Therefore, I think it is logically implausible to put the other branch, which is unit 2, “learners will identify the electronic databases that have literature on the topics they are interested in”, at a parallel position to unit 1. I also recommend that you take a close look at the exemplary examples in the IDA library on this topic. And, don't forget to use Dr. Rieber’s example of the design of a Dreamweaver course. The links are below in the body of IDA itself, but here are the links also, for your convenience: Course design - http://www.nowhereroad.com/instructionaldesign/asp/IDA/course-icm.html Unit design - http://it.coe.uga.edu/~lrieber/edit6170/rieber-dw-unit-icm.htm Your overall Objectives First, it seems to me that there was some redundancy in your writing of the objectives. Your course's most general objective (aka course terminal objective) is good: "SWBAT demonstrate how to find literature on the topic they are interested in." However, your description of the subordinate objectives for this seems ambiguous. In some places, you seemed keep repeating this objective with only slight rewordings. For example, it seems there is little difference between this course objective and what you wrote for the Unit 2 objective, Lesson 1 objective, and Lesson 2 objective. So, what should you do to get a handle on what is required in order for a student to demonstrate how to find literature on the topic they want? The answer is "do a task analysis". Second, in a few places you allowed yourself to let instructional strategies and learning activities "leak into" the objectives, that is, those activities that will be part of the actual lesson design. That comes in the next IDA, not here. The purpose of this IDA is only to identify the performance objectives for the course (which is made up of units), and the performance objectives for one of the units (these will translate into the *objectives* for individual lessons). Identifying these performance objectives and their sequence is as far as you go here. Then, the lesson objectives will be the start of the next main phase of the ID process. For example, what you wrote as the performance objectives for the first half part of lesson 1 and lesson 2 are not objectives, but are instructional strategies which don't belong here. Need to Identify supporting objectives from the verbal information The step 3 in part 2 asks you to identify supporting objectives from both the verbal information and attitudinal domains, but you only identified supporting objective from attitudinal domains. In this place, for example, the unit that you defined as “learners will identify the electronic databases that have literature on the topics they are interested in” could be verbal information supporting objective, restated as this, “learners will list the electronic databases that have literature on the topics they are interested in”. Or, if you feel this does not belong to the domain of verbal information, you can definitely find other objectives after you finish the task analysis. Some other possible verbal objective can be, “learners will recall the contents underneath each of the hot links on the main navigation bar of the GALILEO homepage”. A reminder to try to add the standard capability verbs discussed in the course materials (generate, demonstrate, identify, etc.) in ALL of your objectives to make it clear what learning outcome you are aiming for. (You provided this some of the time, but not always.) Dr. Rieber will be emphasizing this in class when we deal with how to write objectives from an instructional design point of view. The reason why this is important is that it is hard for me (or others) to tell otherwise what learning outcomes your various objectives are aiming for. Being able to know is crucial so I can give you feedback on whether or not you have any violations of learning hierarchies. Recall from the class readings and presentations that according to Gagne, learning in the intellectual skills domain proceeds in a sequential order, starting with concepts ("identify", "classify"), then rules ("demonstrate"), then problem-solving ("generate"). If the order is altered, such as expecting problem-solving before mastering an important prerequisite rule, then learning will not occur. I *think* your course and unit design do not have any violations of a learning hierarchy, but as you add these key verbs to your designs, you should go over them carefully to make sure.
This activity builds on the needs assessment IDA. This IDA is divided into two parts. First, you will design a rough outline of a course. In this context, "course" is defined as an instructional entity, which has both a recognizable start and finish point, and has an organized set of content. It is the most general instructional solution to a problem identified in needs assessment. Second, you will choose one of the units from your course design and design a rough outline of that unit (of course, in the 'real world', you would do this for all of your units). The activity is designed to give you hands-on practice with course- and unit-level task analysis. |