Return to the list of Lesson Design IDAs | Return to the IDA Library Home Page
Instructional Design Activity: Lesson Design
Overall Instructor Rating: Satisfactory Ratings explanation:
Instructor's Overall Feedback: I think your lesson design is great, and I only have a couple of minor recommendations for you as following: Pre-instructional activities: Your pre-instructional activities are good, but I recommend you adding more descriptions about what the instructor or the web-based tutorial will do to make sure that students have the prerequisite skills and how the pre-instructional activities will motivate students to learn this course. Assessment: You may also want to be more specific in the assessment section: what are the criteria that can identify students have learned the searching skills using GALILEO? How will the teacher check with the students’ searching process? Note from Lloyd: I agree with Maggie’s feedback. I also think you should give more details and explanation about your design for each of the lesson components. For example, what will the nature of the activities be during the “learner participation” phase of the lesson. Remember, this is meant to be the first draft of a design document from which you will begin the development of the lesson. So, the more detail you provide here, the better start you will have to the next step in the design work (such as constructing scripts, storyboards, etc.). Also, I noticed that your lesson objective targets problem-solving. This is unusual in the sense that problem-solving is best considered as an outcome of a set of lessons of even several units. Lesson objectives usually focus on concepts, and or rule-using objectives. By targeting problem-solving, you are implying that the learner already has mastered all prerequisite concepts and rules.
The purpose of this activity is to design a specific lesson based on the lesson objectives identified in one of your unit instructional curriculum maps (ICMs). This IDA is designed to give you practice in planning lesson based on Gagne's events of instruction (see Dick, Carey, and Carey, chapter 8). Complete the instructional strategy planning sheet below for one lesson of your choice. Preferably, this is a lesson that you identified during the unit design analysis. However, you can choose any lesson you wish. As outlined by Dick, Carey, and Carey, it may be helpful to organize the events of instruction in the following major groups or components: Pre-instructional activities, Content presentation, Learner participation, Assessment, Follow-through activities. Your instructional plan should emphasize materials-centered instruction. That is, you should consider resources other than a live instructor for the delivery of the lesson. As you consider possible media, also consider the affordances, or special characteristics, that various media possess. Instructional Strategy Planning Sheet Write the instructional objectives of your lesson here (it can be more than one): Your final response: SWBAT generate a comprehensive, web-based literature search using the GALILEO@UGA search engine when a review of literature relevant to their inquiry is needed. The instructor's feedback to this step: No specific feedback given on this step.
Enter your instructional plan for each of the instructional components. Also indicate your media choice for each instructional component.
Provide a rationale for your media choices. How do the media you have selected support the instructional plan you have designed? Do the affordances of the media you've selected match the instructional strategy and support student learning? Examples of media affordances:
Your final response: No final draft Having an Internet-accessible interface is an appropriate choice for this lesson because all UGA students, especially grad students, must have Internet access in order to be a fully functioning student at UGA. Most students will be able to access the lesson from multiple locations, which will make it easier for them to get the instruction they need. The instructor's feedback to step 4: No specific feedback given on this step.
|